How Locuvox compares to Peec, Profound & Otterly
Same category, very different maths. Here's the honest comparison — list prices, engines included, and the capabilities only one platform has. All figures from public pricing pages, July 2026.
Price per tracked prompt — the cleanest unit
Every tool sells "tracked prompts" (the questions checked daily against AI engines). Divide price by prompts and the tools become comparable.
| Plan | Price / mo | Prompts | $ / prompt | Engines included |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locuvox Starter | $49 | 75 | $0.65 | 7 core, all included |
| Locuvox Growth | $149 | 175 | $0.85 | 7 core, all included |
| Peec Starter | $95 | 50 | $1.90 | 3 — others cost extra per engine |
| Peec Pro | $245 | 150 | $1.63 | 3 — others cost extra per engine |
| Profound Starter | $99 | 50 | $1.98 | ChatGPT only |
| Otterly Standard | $189 | 100 | $1.89 | 4 — others cost extra per engine |
Locuvox includes ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews & AI Mode on every plan, flat — premium models (Claude, Perplexity API) simply count as 4 checks, never a per-engine fee. Competitor engine add-ons typically run $9–$439 per engine per month.
The Consideration Set — only Locuvox shows it
“None of these tools document tracking which pages AI systems read versus cited. This consideration-set gap applies to all five vendors reviewed.”
— independent benchmark of Profound, Peec, Scrunch, Ahrefs and Semrush, 2026
Locuvox captures each answer's Consideration Set — every page ChatGPT and Perplexity read while answering — split into cited vs read-but-passed-over. It's the difference between a ranking problem (never read — go rank for the fan-out query) and a content problem (read and skipped — fix the page). No other platform makes that diagnosis.
Capability by capability
| Capability | Locuvox | Peec | Profound | Otterly |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engines on the entry plan | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Microsoft Copilot | ✓ | ✓ | Enterprise | ✓ |
| Real captured fan-out queries | 5 engines | ChatGPT | ✓ | – |
| The Consideration Set (read-vs-cited) | ✓ | – | – | – |
| Fetched-vs-cited domain rollup | ✓ | – | – | – |
| Ads inside AI answers (Ad Share of Voice) | ✓ | – | – | – |
| Shopping placement tracking | ✓ | ✓ | – | – |
| Sentiment dashboards | 7 | Basic | Strong | Basic |
| Memory vs Retrieval per engine | ✓ | – | – | – |
| Action-plan briefs from real evidence | ✓ | – | Articles (Growth+) | URL audits |
| REST API + MCP server | All paid plans | Higher tiers | Enterprise | $189+ |
| Reporting feed (Sheets → AgencyAnalytics, Looker…) | ✓ | Looker | Enterprise | Looker |
| Full product white-label + reseller pricing | ✓ | – | – | – |
| Per-client team access (scoped seats) | ✓ | – | – | – |
Comparison reflects publicly documented features as of July 2026. Things move fast in this category — check each vendor's site for current details: Peec, Profound, Otterly.
The agency stack nobody else ships
Run AI-visibility retainers under your own brand: full white-label (your logo, your domain, your Stripe pricing), a project per client, team members scoped to only the clients they work on, magic-link client dashboards, and a daily metrics feed into AgencyAnalytics or Looker Studio. Competitors offer white-label reports at Enterprise tiers — not a white-label product.
See your own numbers, free
Every plan starts with a 14-day free trial — or get an instant read with the free AI Visibility Scorecard.